CETACEAN COMMUNICATION AND COGNITION GROUP
  • Home
  • The Team
  • Research
  • Publications
  • News and Media
  • Funders
  • Mascot

Catch up with all our news here!

New Publication: An interim framework for assessing the population consequences of disturbance 

6/30/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
I am pleased to announce the publication of “An interim framework for assessing the population consequences of disturbance” in Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Authors; Stephanie L. King, Robert S. Schick, Carl Donovan, Cormac G. Booth, Mark Burgman, Len Thomas and John Harwood

Abstract:
  1. Changes in natural patterns of animal behaviour and physiology resulting from anthropogenic disturbance may alter the conservation status of a population if they affect the ability of individuals to survive, breed or grow. However, information to forecast population-level consequences of such changes is often lacking.
  2. We developed an interim framework to assess the population consequences of disturbance when empirical information is sparse. We show how daily effects of disturbance, which are often straightforward to estimate, can be scaled to the disturbance duration and to multiple sources of disturbance.
  3. We used expert elicitation to estimate parameters that define how changes in individual behaviour or physiology affect vital rates and incorporated them into a stochastic population model. Model outputs can be used to evaluate cumulative impacts of disturbance over space and time. As an example, we forecast the potential effects of disturbance from offshore wind farm construction on the North Sea harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) population.
  4. Synthesis and applications. The interim framework can be used to forecast the effects of disturbances from human activities on animal populations, to assess the effectiveness of mitigation measures and to identify priority areas for research that reduces uncertainty in population forecasts. The last two applications are likely to be important in situations where there is a risk of unacceptable change in a species' conservation status. The framework should, however, be augmented with empirical data as soon as these are available.

You can access the article at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2041-210X.12411/full

0 Comments

    Archives

    March 2023
    September 2022
    March 2022
    July 2021
    March 2021
    October 2020
    April 2020
    October 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    December 2018
    September 2018
    June 2018
    November 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    July 2015
    June 2015
    October 2013
    July 2013
    February 2013

    Categories

    All
    Awards
    Publications

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • The Team
  • Research
  • Publications
  • News and Media
  • Funders
  • Mascot